>Yes, We Have No Hate Crimes Laws In South Carolina

>

In the days following the brutal beating of Joshua Esskew [see post HERE], a gay man, that was caught on a Rock Hill, South Carolina convenience store’s surveillance camera, the sponsor of a hate crimes bill that got nowhere in the state legislature last year, John King, a Democrat from Rock Hill, plans to re-introduce the bill this week and ask that it be discussed immediately by legislators.

Of course, two Republican legislators , who admit that the attack on Joshua Esskew, was “horrific,” say that existing laws are enough to prosecute people who violently attack others. And spokesmorons for our asshat-wingnut governor, The Transparent Nikki Haley, say she doesn’t support state hate crime laws either. Naturally.

Rep. John King

John King, however, will still ask that his bill be taken directly to the House floor when the Legislature reconvenes after a week off, because he feels that hate crimes should not be tolerated and deserve harsher punishments: “We need an all-inclusive hate crime law in this state that protects all people regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation.”

Now, for those of you who think that hate crimes laws are unnecessary because we punish people who attack and mug and kill other people anyway, let me offer up a little scenario:

I’m walking down the streets of Smallville, and someone decides I must have a pocketful of money, and they hold me up at gunpoint and steal from me. Then, perhaps they don’t think I’m handing over the cash fast enough, so they beat me to a pulp.

Hateful, yes. Hate, no.

But, say I’m walking down the street and some guy decides that, oh, from the way I walk, or my clothes or whatever, that I’m a big old queen, and he beats me to a pulp just for being gay.

Hateful, yes. Hate, yes.

We need hate crimes legislation, in the states and at the federal level, to protect anyone from being attacked simply because of who they are, or are assumed to be, This goes for your gender, your orientation, your skin color, your religion, your age. 

If you are attacked, beaten and killed because of who you are, then it is an attack motivated by hatred.
If you are attacked, beaten, and killed because someone wants your money or your watch or your car, then that attack is motivated by greed.

Hate. Greed,

If you hate someone enough to beat them to unconsiousness, and leave them to die, say on a fence in Wyoming, or on  street in Brooklyn, then you deserve the fullest punishment of the law.

Hate is hate and should not be diminished.

source

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Hate Crimes Legislation, John King, Joshua Esskew

2 responses to “>Yes, We Have No Hate Crimes Laws In South Carolina

  1. >Awesome post – it seems that despite the Union being progressive on many fronts, the minds are closed to simply "what is right" – surely there is bias in the sense that it's OK if it's done to gays or someone of the wrong colour etc! When will they wake up???

  2. >This tragic and outrageous case brings to mind the situation here in the U.K. where, leading the opposition to legislation for hate crimes against people because of their sexuality, whilst supporting the same on grounds of race or religion, are (surprise, surprise!)….. religious leaders! – on the same grounds that you refer to, viz. that there are already adequate laws in place. I think that attitude is quite pervasive the world over (among those countries who recognise that gays should have any rights at all!) though you manage to crystallise expertly the clear NEED for such specific laws.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s